FASHION STRES

Film Faster is a story of revenge

After spending 10 years in prison for his part in an armed robbery a man who is only ever referred to as “Driver” or “Ghost” (Dwayne “Stop Calling Me The Rock” Johnson) walks out of the big house and immediately begins to hunt down the men (including Courtney Gains, John Cirigliano, Lester Speight) who robbed his crew and killed his brother (Matt Gerald). If you’ve seen the trailer for Faster you might assume that’s the entire story. It’s not. Not satisfied with simply delivering a good ol’ revenge tale filled with an ever increasing body count, screenwriters Tony Gayton and Joe Gayton give us not one but two more stories.

The first involves a burned-out detective (Billy Bob Thornton) who is days away from retirement, has a nasty drug habit and an estranged wife (Moon Bloodgood) and son (Aedin Mincks), and who is assigned to the case – much the dismay of the lead detective Carla Gugino. Most of this plotline deals with chasing down “Driver,” but we also get several unrelated scenes of the cop’s screwed-up life.

The last storyline involves a hitman (Oliver Jackson-Cohen) who may have had polio as a child (the movie cannot stop showing us pictures of him as a child on crutches) who is hired to stop “Driver.” There are a few tense confrontations over the course of the film between “Killer” and “Driver” (anyone else wondering how long it took two screenwriters to come up with those names?), but most of this story has more to do with his relationship to his girlfriend (Maggie Grace) and their future together than actually stopping The Rock’s character.

Faster isn’t an awful film, but it bites off far more than it can chew. The three separate stories never really fit together, and the attempt to merge them during the film’s climax is the worst kind of late-movie twist. The script is constantly moving between the three plotlines and comes off unfocused at times. This isn’t one main story with several subplots. This is three separate tales only loosely connected to each other, all of which could use a full-length feature to flesh out completely.

And the film wastes much of what it has going for it. I wanted more of Grace’s character, who is really only used here as a simple plot device and some yummy eye candy (appearing in scenes in sexy lingerie or nude, covered only by well-placed bed sheet). Tom Berenger has small performance as the warden in the film’s opening sequence, but quickly disappears. And Gugino, the cop we actually want to see, is given far less screen time than Thornton’s phoned-in performance. These are all characters which a smarter film would make better use of and develop.

The action scenes are adequately done, and the first murder “Driver” commits is the best of his kills, simply due to its immediacy and shock value. That said, there’s nothing all the special, memorable, or fun going on here. The script is without humor or style. But the cars are nice. That’s something, right?

Faster never tries to be more than a cheap B-movie action flick–the kind better suited to a brooding, ultra-serious action star like Jason Statham or Vin Diesel. The Rock, who has infinite amounts more charm, is limited by the small amount of dialogue and emotion he gets to showcase here. (I think Stallone had more lines in Rambo III.) The film’s ending is also extremely anti-climactic, leaving much to be resolved in what appears to be the inevitable sequel. Hopefully it will be more entertaining.

George Tillman Jr. (director)/Tony Gayton (writer)/Joe Gayton (writer)

Cast: Dwayne Johnson … Driver

Billy Bob Thornton … Cop

Oliver Jackson-Cohen … Killer

Carla Gugino … Cicero

Maggie Grace … Lily

Moon Bloodgood … Marina

Source: beyondhollywood





Faster


Faster


Faster


Faster


Faster

Sonakshi Sinha to the star opposite Akshay Kumar

After impressing one and all with her performance in Dabangg, Sonakshi Sinha is certainly a hot property. The pretty actress has been signed by Shirish Kunder for his ambitious 3D directorial venture Joker. Sonakshi would be paired opposite none other than Akshay Kumar in Joker.

Explaining his choice of why Sonakshi for the leading lady, Shirish reasons, "Sonakshi fitted the role perfectly. Hers is an extremely performance oriented character which is there throughout the film with Akshay. Besides another reason for choosing Sonakshi is the fact that she and Akki would be a fresh on-screen pair considering Akshay has worked with most of the top leading ladies." Unlike Dabangg in which she played a village belle, Sonakshi would be seen playing a modern girl in Joker.

Besides Akshay and Sonakshi, Joker would also boast of a huge supporting cast which Shirish would be announcing in the days to come. Commenting on whether there will be some Hollywood technicians involved considering that it's a 3-D film, Shirish says, "Most of the technicians will be from India but yes, since this a new technology, we would be using the expertise of some experienced names from Hollywood too."

Joker is a co-production between Farah Khan & Shirish Kunder's Three's Company and Akshay's Hari Om Entertainment. The film goes on floors in January 2011 and will be mostly shot all around India.

Source: Bollywood Hungama





sonakshi-akshay


sonakshi-akshay


sonakshi-akshay


sonakshi-akshay

Sanjay leela Bhansali, films are process of self-annihilation

Sanjay Leela Bhansali, often accused of making overtly flamboyant and whimsical movies, says his films create the world he lives in and are about crossing the boundaries of mainstream cinema. Guzaarish, his latest offering, is about the pain and isolation he faced after Saawariya, he says. He also believes that Aamir Khan cares about Bhansali's films and that's why he is so critical. "...he cares about my cinema. If he didn't, he wouldn't spend so much passion talking about it," Bhansali said in an interview.

Q: Are you more exhausted after Guzaarish than you've ever been?

A: I didn't realize how tired I was until the film was over. Then my body just gave up. All my films are a process of self-annihilation for me. With every film of mine, a part of me gets left behind. With Guzaarish, I've left more than just a portion of myself behind. In it, I've lived the pain of facing the isolation of failure after Saawariya.

Q: Was that a tough time for you?

A: It was the toughest time of my life. Suddenly, everyone disappeared, and that included the people who had worked with me on Saawariya for two years. Because of the suffering, I began to get seriously interested in the subject of mercy killing. I began to read up as much as possible on the subject. My research showed that mercy killing was prohibited by law in many countries, including India. After almost a year of studying the super-sensitive subject, I concluded that every human being should have the right to die with dignity.

Q: Are your films supposed to be for social good?

A: No, no, I make them for selfish reasons. When I make a film about a physically challenged person, I come away with so much. I learn to value what I have. My survival instinct has sharpened after Black and Guzaarish. I met quadriplegics who have lost the use of their limbs but not their spirit. They are not dark, defeated people. Some of them are very entertaining. Our specialist on the sets, Indu Tandon, introduced me to bright people paralysed in body but liberated in spirit. They can't feel anything in their body, and yet they are so buoyant. One of these kids, John Julius, became the hero of Guzaarish. Hrithik plays this caustic, undefeated hero in a wheelchair. John and Hrithik became great friends. They started exchanging e-mails. Hrithik changed John's life completely. If my cinema can change one life, I've achieved what I had to achieve.

Q: Aamir Khan thinks the little girl in Black (Ayesha Kapoor) was treated brutally?

A: Yes, I keep hearing that the girl was traumatised. But Behroze Vaccha, who has spent all her life working with deaf and blind, thought otherwise. So whom should I believe? I don't worry about what others have to say. My proudest moment was when the principal of the Helen Keller Institute told me after Black that what she couldn't achieve in 60 years, I did with that one film. I rest my case.

Q: Aamir had a lot of problems with your Devdas and Black.

A: He did. But that's because he cares about my cinema. If he didn't, he wouldn't spend so much passion talking about it. He may not agree with what I do in my films, but finally, I make what I have to make. I appreciate it when an actor of his calibre brings out a certain perspective on my cinema.

As long as the intentions are not to run my cinema down, I am open to all criticism. Aamir's concern is genuine. He has problems with my cinema, just as I may have problems with a lot of his performances.

Q: Guzaarish has a lot of references to magic and magicians.

A: I feel life has a lot of magic in it. A smile, a film, a performance or a song by Lataji...they are all magic. Magic should not just be illusory. In my film, a magician transforms into a man who can bring smiles to people's faces. That, to me, is magic. Life is magic. Mother Teresa and Lata Mangeshkar are magicians.

Q: Why are your films so often set in the Anglo-Indian community?

A: That's the influence of my school and teachers. The passion with which they taught, the homes in which they lived and where I was invited to on rare occasions...I was enamoured of their lives, their eating habits, their red wine in crystal glasses. It was so different from the Gujarati life that I led in my chawl in Bhuleshwar. It provided me an alternate reality.

Q: Did Hrithik actually learn magic tricks and put on weight for his role?

A: I don't believe in method acting. I don't instruct my actors too closely. I just tell them what I want. I wanted Hrithik to know his character's state of mind. If he played a magician, he knew he had to learn magic tricks. A person who is in bed for 14 years had to be flabby. I am glad Hrithik has reached a stage in his career where he's ready to surrender to a role and not be concerned only with looking good.

Q: You've also composed the songs in Guzaarish . How different is it from getting the music from other composers?

A: You can never get the exact music you want from others. Since you know your characters, you know exactly what kind of emotion they would feel. The songs came from deep within me. The music in Guzaarish is my own and very important. My reward was when Amitabh Bachchan said he loved it. It meant so much to me. I never thought the music would have such a strong appeal for the young. The fact that my songs have connected with the young makes me want to go deeper into music.

Q: People are commenting on the self-contained no-man's land in which your cinema unfolds.

A: My films are my world. It's my own world that I show in my cinema. It's a world different from the real world and different from the word you see in other people's films. My Devdas was not set in 1939; it was timeless. This doesn't mean I'd show Devdas talking on a cellphone. I want that moment that bonds two lovers to be relevant even a hundred years from now. For me, the joy of crossing the boundaries of mainstream cinema is what making films is about. I've great faith in the audience.

Q: Is it tough to have so many expectations riding on you?

A: No, it's a privilege and a joy. I always want to make films from my heart.

Source: NDTV





Sanjay leela Bhansali


Sanjay leela Bhansali


Sanjay leela Bhansali


Sanjay leela Bhansali


Sanjay leela Bhansali